The Shedding, 2nd take
info
2023-01-09
Monday update on the very concerning theme of mRNA vaxx shedding from december 22:
8 months ago · 7 likes · overcatbe
We’ll take a look at fresh new article from Helene Banoun,
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
french original here (Jan 23):
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Helene-Banoun.
My comments are enclosed in *** comment ***
This article is a follow-up of the November’s article
This lady is going places with calling the mRNA shots by their name - gene therapy:
”The mRNA vaccines correspond exactly to the definition of gene therapy of the American and European regulatory agencies”
It is advised to go and read the articles by yourself, because, that is what clever people oughta do.
For the folks who do want to do this, some highlights:
0 - mRNA products correspond with the definition of gene therapy (yeah Sherlock)
My addition:
***
NOT in Germany, where “mRNA vaccines” are to be classified as gene therapy, ONLY IF
the therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic effect of the medicinal product is directly related to the mRNA it contains or the correspondingly expressed protein
On the other hand,..
Medicinal products with mRNA that are vaccines against infectious diseases, on the other hand, are not classified as gene therapy medicinal products and therefore not classified as ATMP.
*** end
1 - excretion studies have NOT been done for mRNA products
2 - mRNA carrying LNP’s are found in the bloodstream (and all organs, including brain), and free form vaccine spike too, often encapsulated in exosomes
3 - mRNA-containing LNPs, modified spike-encoding mRNA, and the spike produced by vaccinees are prone to be excreted by feces, secretions (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids,semen, breast milk, sputum etc); and through the skin
4 - there is an observable correlation in excess mortality between non-vaccinated age groups (kids) and vaccinated parents.
This correlation lasts up to 18!! weeks after parental vaccination.
5 - the biosafety guidelines were not observed, because the used designation/term “VACCINE” allowed them to escape clinical trials on:
- excretion potential
- biodistribution
- pharmacodynamics
- genotoxicity
- insertional mutagenesis
While, the possibility of “adverse reaction from exposure” is mentioned in the Pfizer Phase I/II/III trial itself.
***
(We all know these citations, but here you go)
***
6 - the (loaded) LNP’s (and exosomes, which LNP’s seek to mimic) can be administered:
- intradermally
- orally
- intratracheally (breath)
- ophthamically (eyes)
- topically (skin)
- subcutaneously/injection
7 - Fate of vaccine mRNA
Compared to a natural infection, up to 7-10 x more mRNA are injected with the mRNA “vaccine”, the lifetime is much longer than claimed by the manufacturers.
***
If you want to know why, go read this, or this
in short, they have substituted natural U for synthetic m1ψ, because they have thought that it stabilizes the molecule, so it stays longer in the body, also the amount of produced protein is higher”.
***
Lady Banoun proposes following biodistribution:
*** which could mean, that the vaccinated are shedding the material for at least 4 months ***
8 - Later in the article, the use of nanoparticles for therapeutic purposes by inhalation, transdermal, in utero etc is being discussed. Examples of treatments such as for periondontitis, ulcers, epidermolysis bullosa or Alzheimer’s are being shown. Also clinical trials for new mRNA “vaccines” are mentioned.
The article closes with a call for additional pharmacokinetic studies to this theme.
***
Go read it for yourself. Seems like sh*t is getting real.
I for once think it is high time to stop ALL mRNA products in the roll out.
